<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 320 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121441</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the waiver of pre-deposit for the assessees in a case involving separate central excise registration for the texturised yarn unit and revocation of the same. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeal against the revocation of central excise registration for the DTY division. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s stay applications, declining to reinstate the order revoking the separate registration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:53:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 320 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121441</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the waiver of pre-deposit for the assessees in a case involving separate central excise registration for the texturised yarn unit and revocation of the same. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeal against the revocation of central excise registration for the DTY division. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s stay applications, declining to reinstate the order revoking the separate registration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>