<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 440 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121417</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, permitting the appellants to avail Modvat credit on invoices endorsed multiple times, following the precedent set in a previous case. This decision clarifies the interpretation of the law on this issue, ensuring consistency and providing guidance for future cases involving similar disputes. The ruling emphasizes the importance of legal precedents in upholding appellants&#039; rights to claim legitimate credits within the legal framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:19:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 440 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121417</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, permitting the appellants to avail Modvat credit on invoices endorsed multiple times, following the precedent set in a previous case. This decision clarifies the interpretation of the law on this issue, ensuring consistency and providing guidance for future cases involving similar disputes. The ruling emphasizes the importance of legal precedents in upholding appellants&#039; rights to claim legitimate credits within the legal framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>