<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 432 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121408</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled that the revenue&#039;s appeals on a rebate claim lacked jurisdiction as they should have been filed before the Joint Secretary to the Government of India. The Tribunal rejected all appeals, allowing the limitation period to be saved if refiled in the correct forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:39:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 432 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121408</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled that the revenue&#039;s appeals on a rebate claim lacked jurisdiction as they should have been filed before the Joint Secretary to the Government of India. The Tribunal rejected all appeals, allowing the limitation period to be saved if refiled in the correct forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>