<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 429 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121405</link>
    <description>Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 permits capital goods to be sent to a job worker for processing while credit remains available. Where the capital goods were sent on 31-03-2004 and the credit was reversed on 26-07-2004, the reversal fell within the 180-day period contemplated by the rule. On that basis, no interest liability arose on the delayed reversal, and refund of interest already paid was properly admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:26:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 429 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121405</link>
      <description>Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 permits capital goods to be sent to a job worker for processing while credit remains available. Where the capital goods were sent on 31-03-2004 and the credit was reversed on 26-07-2004, the reversal fell within the 180-day period contemplated by the rule. On that basis, no interest liability arose on the delayed reversal, and refund of interest already paid was properly admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>