<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 612 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121400</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the CIT to verify the timely filing of Form No. III with the Registrar of Companies. If the form was filed within the due period, the assessee&#039;s claim under section 10A should be accepted. Additionally, the Tribunal permitted the assessee to make an alternative claim under section 80HHE during the fresh proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:06:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 612 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121400</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the CIT to verify the timely filing of Form No. III with the Registrar of Companies. If the form was filed within the due period, the assessee&#039;s claim under section 10A should be accepted. Additionally, the Tribunal permitted the assessee to make an alternative claim under section 80HHE during the fresh proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>