<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 425 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121397</link>
    <description>DEEC licences that expressly covered import of LLDPE/LDPE/HDPE/PP granules were treated as valid and operative because no material showed misdeclaration by the exporters and the licences had not been cancelled. As the licences were transferable and the transferees imported goods within the licence terms, no breach of the import policy or of Notification No. 204/92-Customs was established, and the customs demand and proposed penalties did not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:03:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 425 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121397</link>
      <description>DEEC licences that expressly covered import of LLDPE/LDPE/HDPE/PP granules were treated as valid and operative because no material showed misdeclaration by the exporters and the licences had not been cancelled. As the licences were transferable and the transferees imported goods within the licence terms, no breach of the import policy or of Notification No. 204/92-Customs was established, and the customs demand and proposed penalties did not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>