<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 538 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121389</link>
    <description>Cess under the Oil Industries (Development) Act, 1974 was held assessable on the quantity received in the refinery, because Section 15(2) fixes the taxable incidence by reference to that statutory measure. The Tribunal rejected assessment on the quantity produced in the oil fields, as that approach departed from the charging provision. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh verification of duty payment on the refinery-received quantity, with an opportunity of hearing to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:23:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 538 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121389</link>
      <description>Cess under the Oil Industries (Development) Act, 1974 was held assessable on the quantity received in the refinery, because Section 15(2) fixes the taxable incidence by reference to that statutory measure. The Tribunal rejected assessment on the quantity produced in the oil fields, as that approach departed from the charging provision. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh verification of duty payment on the refinery-received quantity, with an opportunity of hearing to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>