<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 535 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121385</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. 50,000/- imposed on the Customs House Agent for over-valuation of goods to claim a higher drawback amount. The Tribunal found that the goods were mis-declared, the appellant was aware of the exporter&#039;s intentions, and the appellant&#039;s claim of authorization was unsupported by evidence. Previous case laws cited by the appellant were deemed irrelevant, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:14:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 535 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121385</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. 50,000/- imposed on the Customs House Agent for over-valuation of goods to claim a higher drawback amount. The Tribunal found that the goods were mis-declared, the appellant was aware of the exporter&#039;s intentions, and the appellant&#039;s claim of authorization was unsupported by evidence. Previous case laws cited by the appellant were deemed irrelevant, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>