<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 677 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121339</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, granting the assessee&#039;s claim for Rs. 49,10,904 as part of the export turnover for deduction under section 10A and treating interest on fixed deposits and staff loans as business income. However, the balance amount of Rs. 4,51,733 was not eligible for deduction, and interest on income-tax refunds was not considered business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 677 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121339</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, granting the assessee&#039;s claim for Rs. 49,10,904 as part of the export turnover for deduction under section 10A and treating interest on fixed deposits and staff loans as business income. However, the balance amount of Rs. 4,51,733 was not eligible for deduction, and interest on income-tax refunds was not considered business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>