<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 675 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121335</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the offshore supply of equipment was not taxable in India and that the assessee was not liable for interest under section 234B. The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, directing that fees for technical services should be taxed on a receipt basis rather than an accrual basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2023 21:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 675 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121335</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the offshore supply of equipment was not taxable in India and that the assessee was not liable for interest under section 234B. The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, directing that fees for technical services should be taxed on a receipt basis rather than an accrual basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>