<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 517 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121304</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the correct classification of imported goods for duty assessment, rejection of refund claims by authorities, and entitlement to interest on delayed refund payments. The appellants were successful in their appeal for interest on the delayed refund payment under Section 27A of the Finance Act 1995, allowing them to receive interest from August 26, 1995, until the refund was made in July 1999.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 12:12:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 517 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121304</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the correct classification of imported goods for duty assessment, rejection of refund claims by authorities, and entitlement to interest on delayed refund payments. The appellants were successful in their appeal for interest on the delayed refund payment under Section 27A of the Finance Act 1995, allowing them to receive interest from August 26, 1995, until the refund was made in July 1999.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>