<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 906 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121296</link>
    <description>Taxability of distribution fees as business profits under the India-UK DTAA depends on whether the assessee had a permanent establishment in India. The record did not conclusively establish the relevant treaty basis for permanent establishment: the assessment proceeded on an agency permanent establishment theory, while the appellate findings were internally inconsistent. Prima facie material also suggested that employees of the assessee may have worked in India in managerial capacities, potentially engaging the service permanent establishment limb under Article 5(2)(k). Because the facts required further verification and any applicable Article 5 limb could be examined, the permanent establishment issue was remitted for fresh consideration under Article 5(2)(k) and Article 5(5).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 12:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 906 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121296</link>
      <description>Taxability of distribution fees as business profits under the India-UK DTAA depends on whether the assessee had a permanent establishment in India. The record did not conclusively establish the relevant treaty basis for permanent establishment: the assessment proceeded on an agency permanent establishment theory, while the appellate findings were internally inconsistent. Prima facie material also suggested that employees of the assessee may have worked in India in managerial capacities, potentially engaging the service permanent establishment limb under Article 5(2)(k). Because the facts required further verification and any applicable Article 5 limb could be examined, the permanent establishment issue was remitted for fresh consideration under Article 5(2)(k) and Article 5(5).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>