<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 507 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121289</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the personal penalties imposed on M/s. Pet Plastic Ltd. and Shri Ritesh Vakil due to insufficient evidence of their direct involvement or knowledge in the diversion of goods. The penalties were overturned based on the lack of proof establishing their culpability, in line with previous decisions in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 11:04:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 507 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121289</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the personal penalties imposed on M/s. Pet Plastic Ltd. and Shri Ritesh Vakil due to insufficient evidence of their direct involvement or knowledge in the diversion of goods. The penalties were overturned based on the lack of proof establishing their culpability, in line with previous decisions in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>