<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 844 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121267</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to modify the assessments to reflect the exemption under section 10(10CC) for tax paid by the employer on behalf of the employees. The Tribunal did not award costs against the revenue, finding no evidence of mala fide intent by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 18:21:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 844 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121267</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to modify the assessments to reflect the exemption under section 10(10CC) for tax paid by the employer on behalf of the employees. The Tribunal did not award costs against the revenue, finding no evidence of mala fide intent by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>