<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 488 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121253</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellants&#039; prayer for ad interim stay, directing the Revenue not to stop clearances prematurely. It emphasized following due process and awaiting the appeal outcome before invoking bank guarantees. The appellants were allowed to clear fresh consignments by paying differential duty under protest, ensuring business continuity. The Tribunal outlined the procedure for this process and scheduled a hearing for the stay applications on a specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:31:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 488 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121253</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellants&#039; prayer for ad interim stay, directing the Revenue not to stop clearances prematurely. It emphasized following due process and awaiting the appeal outcome before invoking bank guarantees. The appellants were allowed to clear fresh consignments by paying differential duty under protest, ensuring business continuity. The Tribunal outlined the procedure for this process and scheduled a hearing for the stay applications on a specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>