<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 485 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121246</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of goods and penalties imposed on the exporting firm and its partner. The appellants mistakenly filed shipping bills in the wrong format but promptly sought rectification, revealing inadvertent errors with no fraudulent intent. The Tribunal emphasized the need for authorities to exercise discretion in such cases, considering the absence of fraudulent activity, leading to the allowance of the appeals and disposal of stay petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:13:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 485 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121246</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of goods and penalties imposed on the exporting firm and its partner. The appellants mistakenly filed shipping bills in the wrong format but promptly sought rectification, revealing inadvertent errors with no fraudulent intent. The Tribunal emphasized the need for authorities to exercise discretion in such cases, considering the absence of fraudulent activity, leading to the allowance of the appeals and disposal of stay petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>