<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 459 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121217</link>
    <description>The appellate Commissioner allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, finding that the Modvat/Cenvat credit disallowance was incorrect. Evidence showed that goods were received as per invoices, justifying the credit taken. The alleged wrongful issuance of invoices was dismissed, with proof provided that goods were supplied, resulting in the appeal being deemed frivolous and costs awarded to the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:39:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 459 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121217</link>
      <description>The appellate Commissioner allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, finding that the Modvat/Cenvat credit disallowance was incorrect. Evidence showed that goods were received as per invoices, justifying the credit taken. The alleged wrongful issuance of invoices was dismissed, with proof provided that goods were supplied, resulting in the appeal being deemed frivolous and costs awarded to the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>