<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 456 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121213</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the deposit of duty during investigation. The appellant&#039;s refund claim of Rs. 50,000 was initially rejected but was later granted by the Tribunal with interest. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Revenue to calculate the interest amount payable to the appellant under Section 11B, emphasizing that the amount deposited by the appellant should be considered as duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:25:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 456 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121213</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the deposit of duty during investigation. The appellant&#039;s refund claim of Rs. 50,000 was initially rejected but was later granted by the Tribunal with interest. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Revenue to calculate the interest amount payable to the appellant under Section 11B, emphasizing that the amount deposited by the appellant should be considered as duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>