<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 451 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121205</link>
    <description>The appellate court ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that there was no evidence of fraudulent intent or evasion of duty in the transfer of capital goods between their factories. The court emphasized the appellants&#039; good faith in paying duty promptly and concluded that the penalties imposed were unwarranted. As a result, the appellate order was modified to waive the penalties and redemption fine imposed on both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:26:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 451 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121205</link>
      <description>The appellate court ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that there was no evidence of fraudulent intent or evasion of duty in the transfer of capital goods between their factories. The court emphasized the appellants&#039; good faith in paying duty promptly and concluded that the penalties imposed were unwarranted. As a result, the appellate order was modified to waive the penalties and redemption fine imposed on both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>