<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 448 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121202</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to extend the show cause notice period, emphasizing the necessity for a thorough investigation and the authority to extend timelines in cases involving irregularities. The Tribunal clarified that the absence of a specific notice period did not prevent confiscation proceedings, and the extension was deemed justified due to incomplete investigation caused by a lack of documents. Consequently, the application for stay was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:21:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 448 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121202</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to extend the show cause notice period, emphasizing the necessity for a thorough investigation and the authority to extend timelines in cases involving irregularities. The Tribunal clarified that the absence of a specific notice period did not prevent confiscation proceedings, and the extension was deemed justified due to incomplete investigation caused by a lack of documents. Consequently, the application for stay was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>