<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 481 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121181</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed as the demands for clearing steel formers for captive consumption were deemed time-barred due to a 15-month delay in issuing the show cause notice after a Board&#039;s Circular. The Circular was held to have only retrospective effect, following the precedent of H.M. Bags Manufacturer v. CCE. The appellants&#039; regular declarations and the department&#039;s awareness of captive consumption further supported the outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:55:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 481 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121181</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed as the demands for clearing steel formers for captive consumption were deemed time-barred due to a 15-month delay in issuing the show cause notice after a Board&#039;s Circular. The Circular was held to have only retrospective effect, following the precedent of H.M. Bags Manufacturer v. CCE. The appellants&#039; regular declarations and the department&#039;s awareness of captive consumption further supported the outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>