<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 476 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121176</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and providing consequential relief to the appellant. It was found that the goods were correctly declared as stock lot, supported by evidence from the supplier and a survey report indicating manufacturing dates. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of accurate declaration in customs clearance, backed by documentary evidence and commercial comparables to validate the transaction value and nature of imported goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:59:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 476 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121176</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and providing consequential relief to the appellant. It was found that the goods were correctly declared as stock lot, supported by evidence from the supplier and a survey report indicating manufacturing dates. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of accurate declaration in customs clearance, backed by documentary evidence and commercial comparables to validate the transaction value and nature of imported goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>