<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 471 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121171</link>
    <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi involved the confirmation of demand for goods found short-cleared without payment of duty. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing copper sheets and circles, explained the shortage by stating that defective goods were undergoing re-processing. The Tribunal found that the revenue failed to verify the appellant&#039;s explanation and lacked evidence of duty evasion. Consequently, the demand was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed, overturning the previous decisions. The judgment emphasized the importance of verifying explanations and the burden of proof on revenue in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:45:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 471 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121171</link>
      <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi involved the confirmation of demand for goods found short-cleared without payment of duty. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing copper sheets and circles, explained the shortage by stating that defective goods were undergoing re-processing. The Tribunal found that the revenue failed to verify the appellant&#039;s explanation and lacked evidence of duty evasion. Consequently, the demand was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed, overturning the previous decisions. The judgment emphasized the importance of verifying explanations and the burden of proof on revenue in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>