<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 468 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121168</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, granting refund with interest at 20% per annum against denial of refund on the ground of unjust enrichment. The Tribunal held that interest on delayed payment is admissible as per prevailing provisions, and the application was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:32:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 468 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121168</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, granting refund with interest at 20% per annum against denial of refund on the ground of unjust enrichment. The Tribunal held that interest on delayed payment is admissible as per prevailing provisions, and the application was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>