<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 466 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121166</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the confiscation of currencies and penalties imposed. The appellant&#039;s challenges regarding the competence of DRI officers, timeliness of the order extending the show cause notice period, and entitlement to redemption of confiscated currencies were rejected. The Tribunal found the confiscation and penalties justified based on the appellant&#039;s association with smuggling offenses and disownment of the goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:20:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 466 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121166</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the confiscation of currencies and penalties imposed. The appellant&#039;s challenges regarding the competence of DRI officers, timeliness of the order extending the show cause notice period, and entitlement to redemption of confiscated currencies were rejected. The Tribunal found the confiscation and penalties justified based on the appellant&#039;s association with smuggling offenses and disownment of the goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>