<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 465 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121164</link>
    <description>Duty was payable on mixed scrap arising from capital goods on which credit had been taken, because Rule 57S(2)(c) was held applicable and the precedent on burnt copper wire was found inapposite; the duty demand on the scrap was therefore sustained. Penalty equal to the duty was not justified, as the scrap had been cleared under invoices already furnished to the Revenue and no suppression or misdeclaration was established; the penalty was accordingly set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:19:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 465 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121164</link>
      <description>Duty was payable on mixed scrap arising from capital goods on which credit had been taken, because Rule 57S(2)(c) was held applicable and the precedent on burnt copper wire was found inapposite; the duty demand on the scrap was therefore sustained. Penalty equal to the duty was not justified, as the scrap had been cleared under invoices already furnished to the Revenue and no suppression or misdeclaration was established; the penalty was accordingly set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>