https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121162 Definitive anti-dumping duty under Notification No. 73/2003 was treated as relating back to the date of the provisional anti-dumping duty, so the interregnum import period was also covered by the levy. The commentary notes that the Tribunal relied on an earlier three-member Bench ruling holding that definitive anti-dumping duty can be imposed retrospectively in accordance with the notification. It further states that the three-member Anti-dumping Bench's view is binding on other Benches, leaving no room to reject retrospective recovery on that basis. en-us Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:10:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121162 Definitive anti-dumping duty under Notification No. 73/2003 was treated as relating back to the date of the provisional anti-dumping duty, so the interregnum import period was also covered by the levy. The commentary notes that the Tribunal relied on an earlier three-member Bench ruling holding that definitive anti-dumping duty can be imposed retrospectively in accordance with the notification. It further states that the three-member Anti-dumping Bench's view is binding on other Benches, leaving no room to reject retrospective recovery on that basis. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121162