<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 482 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121141</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of the rented premises in the assessee&#039;s net wealth for the relevant period as they were not used for business purposes but rented out. The Tribunal directed verification of the property value multiplier based on the lease period and instructed recalculating interest under section 17B. The appeals by the assessee were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 18:20:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 482 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121141</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of the rented premises in the assessee&#039;s net wealth for the relevant period as they were not used for business purposes but rented out. The Tribunal directed verification of the property value multiplier based on the lease period and instructed recalculating interest under section 17B. The appeals by the assessee were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>