<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 355 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121129</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, determining that the payments were for the transfer of designs and drawings, not for technical services. As a result, the requirement to deduct tax at source under section 195 was deemed inapplicable, and the assessee was not considered in default under section 201. The decision hinged on the nature of the payments, adherence to procedural norms, and the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of pertinent case law and circulars.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 355 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121129</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, determining that the payments were for the transfer of designs and drawings, not for technical services. As a result, the requirement to deduct tax at source under section 195 was deemed inapplicable, and the assessee was not considered in default under section 201. The decision hinged on the nature of the payments, adherence to procedural norms, and the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of pertinent case law and circulars.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>