<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 412 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121126</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the sending of inputs Crotonaldehyde to a job worker for the manufacture of special denatured spirit without reversing the credit taken on the inputs. The Tribunal found that the activity qualified as job work under Rule 57F(3) and that the job worker would have been entitled to credit if the inputs had been cleared on payment of duty, making the exercise revenue neutral.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:31:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 412 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121126</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the sending of inputs Crotonaldehyde to a job worker for the manufacture of special denatured spirit without reversing the credit taken on the inputs. The Tribunal found that the activity qualified as job work under Rule 57F(3) and that the job worker would have been entitled to credit if the inputs had been cleared on payment of duty, making the exercise revenue neutral.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>