<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 392 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121093</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that penalty imposition without issuing a show cause notice when duty is paid before the notice is not justified. The Commissioner (Appeals) had imposed a penalty equal to the duty amount, contrary to legal precedents. The Tribunal emphasized the need to adhere to procedural requirements and provide the appellant with a chance to present their case before enhancing penalties. The decision underscored the significance of legal precedents and statutory provisions in determining penalty imposition, ultimately ordering a waiver of pre-deposit of penalty until the appeal&#039;s disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:14:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 392 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121093</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that penalty imposition without issuing a show cause notice when duty is paid before the notice is not justified. The Commissioner (Appeals) had imposed a penalty equal to the duty amount, contrary to legal precedents. The Tribunal emphasized the need to adhere to procedural requirements and provide the appellant with a chance to present their case before enhancing penalties. The decision underscored the significance of legal precedents and statutory provisions in determining penalty imposition, ultimately ordering a waiver of pre-deposit of penalty until the appeal&#039;s disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>