<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 518 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121064</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the supremacy of the latest Supreme Court judgment over conflicting decisions and emphasized addressing doubts through appropriate legal channels. The petitioner&#039;s claim of exemption from tax based on a previous judgment was dismissed, and the Court granted four weeks for objections to be filed before the respondent. The judgment underscores the importance of following legal precedents and established procedures in resolving disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 518 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121064</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the supremacy of the latest Supreme Court judgment over conflicting decisions and emphasized addressing doubts through appropriate legal channels. The petitioner&#039;s claim of exemption from tax based on a previous judgment was dismissed, and the Court granted four weeks for objections to be filed before the respondent. The judgment underscores the importance of following legal precedents and established procedures in resolving disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>