<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 548 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121062</link>
    <description>The case involved M/s. Pothys Clothing (P) Ltd. seeking settlement under Section 32 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for duty liability related to clandestine removals of garments. The applicant admitted liability, made payments, and cooperated with proceedings. The Bench granted immunities, settling duty liability at Rs. 1,47,67,522/- with no further duty payable. Immunities included waiver of interest, penalty, and prosecution. The judgment recognized the applicant&#039;s proactive approach and cooperation, emphasizing rectification of errors and compliance with legal obligations. The granting of immunities and deemed credit reflected acknowledgment of the applicant&#039;s efforts to resolve the matter in good faith.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:08:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 548 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121062</link>
      <description>The case involved M/s. Pothys Clothing (P) Ltd. seeking settlement under Section 32 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for duty liability related to clandestine removals of garments. The applicant admitted liability, made payments, and cooperated with proceedings. The Bench granted immunities, settling duty liability at Rs. 1,47,67,522/- with no further duty payable. Immunities included waiver of interest, penalty, and prosecution. The judgment recognized the applicant&#039;s proactive approach and cooperation, emphasizing rectification of errors and compliance with legal obligations. The granting of immunities and deemed credit reflected acknowledgment of the applicant&#039;s efforts to resolve the matter in good faith.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>