<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 399 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121031</link>
    <description>The appeals challenging penalties imposed on the appellants under the Customs Act were rejected. The penalties of Rs. 20 lakhs on Pankaj P. Shah and Rs. 5 lakhs on Ashok P. Shah were upheld for their involvement in illegal import and sale of goods under Special Imprest Licences. The claim for refund of Rs. 3 crores paid towards Customs duty was also denied, emphasizing the appellants&#039; deep involvement in duty evasion. The judgment concluded that the penalties imposed were justified under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act due to deliberate violations of the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 11:45:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 399 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121031</link>
      <description>The appeals challenging penalties imposed on the appellants under the Customs Act were rejected. The penalties of Rs. 20 lakhs on Pankaj P. Shah and Rs. 5 lakhs on Ashok P. Shah were upheld for their involvement in illegal import and sale of goods under Special Imprest Licences. The claim for refund of Rs. 3 crores paid towards Customs duty was also denied, emphasizing the appellants&#039; deep involvement in duty evasion. The judgment concluded that the penalties imposed were justified under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act due to deliberate violations of the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>