<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 432 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121026</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found conflicting decisions on the maintainability of appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 35B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, signed by the Commissioner without recording his opinion. As a result, the Tribunal referred the issue to a Larger Bench for resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 11:15:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 432 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121026</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found conflicting decisions on the maintainability of appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 35B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, signed by the Commissioner without recording his opinion. As a result, the Tribunal referred the issue to a Larger Bench for resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>