<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 458 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120985</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the exchange loss as a deduction. The decision was based on the mercantile system of accounting and the precedent set by a Special Bench ruling confirmed by the Delhi High Court. The ITAT emphasized the importance of continuity and predictability in judicial decisions, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the nature of exchange loss on external commercial borrowings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:42:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 458 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120985</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the exchange loss as a deduction. The decision was based on the mercantile system of accounting and the precedent set by a Special Bench ruling confirmed by the Delhi High Court. The ITAT emphasized the importance of continuity and predictability in judicial decisions, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the nature of exchange loss on external commercial borrowings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>