<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 425 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120976</link>
    <description>Anti-dumping duty on imported mulberry raw silk could not be sustained because the revenue did not establish, by testing, sampling, or other acceptable evidence, that the goods were 2A grade or below and therefore covered by the notification. The demand had been raised after clearance of the goods, when no sample-based ascertainment was available, and liability could not rest on mere presumption. The order setting aside the duty demand was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:17:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 425 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120976</link>
      <description>Anti-dumping duty on imported mulberry raw silk could not be sustained because the revenue did not establish, by testing, sampling, or other acceptable evidence, that the goods were 2A grade or below and therefore covered by the notification. The demand had been raised after clearance of the goods, when no sample-based ascertainment was available, and liability could not rest on mere presumption. The order setting aside the duty demand was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>