<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 420 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120971</link>
    <description>An exemption notification cannot be read more strictly than its text: where Notification No. 30/2004 required only that credit on inputs or capital goods had not been taken, the absence of duty on the inputs themselves could not be added as a further condition, so exemption was available at least prima facie. For the pre-09.07.2004 period, disclosure of denierage in RT-12 returns negatived suppression of facts, and the revenue&#039;s failure to verify the disclosed particulars weakened the basis for invoking the extended period. The appellant therefore showed a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit, and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:57:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 420 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120971</link>
      <description>An exemption notification cannot be read more strictly than its text: where Notification No. 30/2004 required only that credit on inputs or capital goods had not been taken, the absence of duty on the inputs themselves could not be added as a further condition, so exemption was available at least prima facie. For the pre-09.07.2004 period, disclosure of denierage in RT-12 returns negatived suppression of facts, and the revenue&#039;s failure to verify the disclosed particulars weakened the basis for invoking the extended period. The appellant therefore showed a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit, and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>