https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120961 The tribunal upheld the initiation of a new shipper review under Rule 22, determining that the declarations by the new shipper were sufficient and did not prejudice interested parties. It was found that the new shipper was not related to any prior exporters subject to anti-dumping duties. The tribunal agreed with the Designated Authority's findings on the determination of "normal value" and "export price," concluding that no dumping occurred. Additionally, the tribunal upheld the market economy status granted to the new shipper. Ultimately, the appeal against the withdrawal of anti-dumping duty on vitrified/porcelain tiles was dismissed. en-us Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:36:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120961 The tribunal upheld the initiation of a new shipper review under Rule 22, determining that the declarations by the new shipper were sufficient and did not prejudice interested parties. It was found that the new shipper was not related to any prior exporters subject to anti-dumping duties. The tribunal agreed with the Designated Authority's findings on the determination of "normal value" and "export price," concluding that no dumping occurred. Additionally, the tribunal upheld the market economy status granted to the new shipper. Ultimately, the appeal against the withdrawal of anti-dumping duty on vitrified/porcelain tiles was dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120961