<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 409 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120954</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT, Ahmedabad upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision denying Cenvat credit on duty paid inputs for wire drawn from wire rods. The Tribunal found that the duty paid by the supplier was undisputed and that the respondent had lawfully taken credit for the duty paid, resulting in a revenue-neutral situation. As the Revenue did not challenge the duty payment by the supplier, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the legality of the Cenvat credit taken by the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:57:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 409 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120954</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT, Ahmedabad upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision denying Cenvat credit on duty paid inputs for wire drawn from wire rods. The Tribunal found that the duty paid by the supplier was undisputed and that the respondent had lawfully taken credit for the duty paid, resulting in a revenue-neutral situation. As the Revenue did not challenge the duty payment by the supplier, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the legality of the Cenvat credit taken by the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>