https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120952 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal in a case involving alleged clandestine removal of goods. The Commissioner (Appeals) had set aside the Order-in-Original due to lack of concrete evidence beyond doubts. The Tribunal agreed, stating that entries in private records and statements of the production supervisor and director were insufficient to prove clandestine removal. Without tangible evidence, the allegations could not be upheld, leading to the rejection of the Revenue's appeal. en-us Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:44:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120952 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal in a case involving alleged clandestine removal of goods. The Commissioner (Appeals) had set aside the Order-in-Original due to lack of concrete evidence beyond doubts. The Tribunal agreed, stating that entries in private records and statements of the production supervisor and director were insufficient to prove clandestine removal. Without tangible evidence, the allegations could not be upheld, leading to the rejection of the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120952