<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 447 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120947</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the search under Section 132 was invalid as it was not conducted at the premises occupied by the assessee. Consequently, assessments made under Section 143(3) read with Section 153A were declared null and void. Due to this invalidity, the Tribunal did not adjudicate on the merits of disallowances related to interest under Section 14A, business administrative expenses, and electricity expenses. All five appeals filed by the assessee were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 447 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120947</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the search under Section 132 was invalid as it was not conducted at the premises occupied by the assessee. Consequently, assessments made under Section 143(3) read with Section 153A were declared null and void. Due to this invalidity, the Tribunal did not adjudicate on the merits of disallowances related to interest under Section 14A, business administrative expenses, and electricity expenses. All five appeals filed by the assessee were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>