<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 402 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120942</link>
    <description>In proceedings for finalisation of provisional assessments, the department cannot sustain a differential duty demand higher than the quantum proposed in the show cause notice. Where the notice quantified the proposed demand and the original authority finalised the assessment on a lesser excess payment accepted by the assessee, the appellate authority could not enlarge the demand beyond that notice without a fresh notice or corrigendum. The Tribunal held that an appeal under Section 35E(4) could not be used to travel outside the scope of the original notice, and the higher demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:23:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 402 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120942</link>
      <description>In proceedings for finalisation of provisional assessments, the department cannot sustain a differential duty demand higher than the quantum proposed in the show cause notice. Where the notice quantified the proposed demand and the original authority finalised the assessment on a lesser excess payment accepted by the assessee, the appellate authority could not enlarge the demand beyond that notice without a fresh notice or corrigendum. The Tribunal held that an appeal under Section 35E(4) could not be used to travel outside the scope of the original notice, and the higher demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>