<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 384 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120933</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of the drawback claim, confiscation of goods, and imposition of penalties on M/s. Anuj International due to misdeclaration of value for the export consignment. The decision was based on expert opinions confirming the discrepancy between declared and actual market values, emphasizing that export values are subject to Customs scrutiny regardless of payment realization. Penalties for other parties were waived due to lack of clarity in the impugned order regarding the basis for penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:01:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 384 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120933</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of the drawback claim, confiscation of goods, and imposition of penalties on M/s. Anuj International due to misdeclaration of value for the export consignment. The decision was based on expert opinions confirming the discrepancy between declared and actual market values, emphasizing that export values are subject to Customs scrutiny regardless of payment realization. Penalties for other parties were waived due to lack of clarity in the impugned order regarding the basis for penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>