<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 368 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120913</link>
    <description>Mere accounting write-off of inputs in the balance sheet does not require reversal of Modvat credit where the inputs remain in stock and continue to be used in manufacture. The Tribunal treated the write-off as a revaluation entry, not evidence that the inputs had ceased to exist or were removed from production, and held that a change in book value does not affect credit already lawfully availed. On that basis, reversal was not warranted and the demand was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:18:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 368 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120913</link>
      <description>Mere accounting write-off of inputs in the balance sheet does not require reversal of Modvat credit where the inputs remain in stock and continue to be used in manufacture. The Tribunal treated the write-off as a revaluation entry, not evidence that the inputs had ceased to exist or were removed from production, and held that a change in book value does not affect credit already lawfully availed. On that basis, reversal was not warranted and the demand was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>