<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 446 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120898</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling that the disallowance of interest expenditure under Section 14A was unjustified since no exempt income was earned during the assessment year. It further instructed the AO to reconsider the classification of interest expenses as capital expenditure, referencing the Tribunal&#039;s decision in Birla Group of Holdings Ltd. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 446 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120898</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling that the disallowance of interest expenditure under Section 14A was unjustified since no exempt income was earned during the assessment year. It further instructed the AO to reconsider the classification of interest expenses as capital expenditure, referencing the Tribunal&#039;s decision in Birla Group of Holdings Ltd. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>