<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 377 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120881</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on escalation invoices for capital goods could not be denied where the same goods had already been received under original invoices and credit had been allowed on that receipt. The later invoices reflected only a price escalation for the same capital goods and did not change their character or affect the admissibility of credit already recognised. On that basis, denial of credit on the escalation invoices was not justified, and the disallowance was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:43:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 377 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120881</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on escalation invoices for capital goods could not be denied where the same goods had already been received under original invoices and credit had been allowed on that receipt. The later invoices reflected only a price escalation for the same capital goods and did not change their character or affect the admissibility of credit already recognised. On that basis, denial of credit on the escalation invoices was not justified, and the disallowance was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>