<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 376 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120880</link>
    <description>Service tax paid on goods transport agency services used for outward transportation of finished goods beyond the factory gate was treated as falling within the broad definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. On that basis, the appellant established a strong prima facie case against denial of Cenvat credit, and interim protection was granted by waiving pre-deposit of service tax and penalty and staying recovery during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:42:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 376 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120880</link>
      <description>Service tax paid on goods transport agency services used for outward transportation of finished goods beyond the factory gate was treated as falling within the broad definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. On that basis, the appellant established a strong prima facie case against denial of Cenvat credit, and interim protection was granted by waiving pre-deposit of service tax and penalty and staying recovery during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>