<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 439 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120878</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer for the assessment year 1992-93 under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the documentary evidence provided, which proved that the amounts in question were shoguns received at the time of the daughter&#039;s marriage, not gifts. The Tribunal reversed the lower authorities&#039; decisions, concluding that the additions were not justified based on the evidence presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:33:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 439 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120878</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer for the assessment year 1992-93 under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the documentary evidence provided, which proved that the amounts in question were shoguns received at the time of the daughter&#039;s marriage, not gifts. The Tribunal reversed the lower authorities&#039; decisions, concluding that the additions were not justified based on the evidence presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>