<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 496 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120872</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the doctrine of merger. The Tribunal held that the Order-in-Original had merged with the Order-in-Appeal, rendering the subsequent review untimely and the appeal not maintainable. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the Revenue&#039;s appeal lacked merit due to the principle of merger. This case underscores the importance of adhering to established legal principles and timelines in customs and excise matters, clarifying the implications of merged orders on the maintainability of appeals before the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:23:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 496 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120872</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the doctrine of merger. The Tribunal held that the Order-in-Original had merged with the Order-in-Appeal, rendering the subsequent review untimely and the appeal not maintainable. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the Revenue&#039;s appeal lacked merit due to the principle of merger. This case underscores the importance of adhering to established legal principles and timelines in customs and excise matters, clarifying the implications of merged orders on the maintainability of appeals before the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>